Before writing off a damaged BK Medical 2050, compare its symptoms against the failure modes below. Many lens, cable and connector faults on this probe class are economically repairable.
| Manufacturer | BK Medical |
|---|---|
| Model | 2050 |
| Probe type | Endocavity array |
| Compatible systems | BK Medical Falcon 2101, BK Medical Hawk 2102, BK Medical Pro Focus 2202, BK Medical Viking 2400 |
In service the 2050 is most often found on BK Medical Falcon 2101, BK Medical Hawk 2102, BK Medical Pro Focus 2202, BK Medical Viking 2400. Console-side settings and module revisions still vary, so the exact system build is part of any assessment.
For endocavity heads such as the 2050, reprocessing chemistry is the main enemy – seal integrity and lens condition decide service life more than the electronics do.
Common failure modes for the 2050
Match what you are seeing against the table below. The right-hand column reflects how faults of this kind typically assess – the actual verdict always depends on the individual probe.
| What you see | Likely cause | Typically repairable? |
|---|---|---|
| Cable jacket cracked, wrinkled or discolored | Jacket wear; conductors may still be intact underneath | Usually repairable |
| Whole regions of the image blank across the array width | Widespread element or acoustic stack failure | Usually not economical |
| Bent, broken or corroded connector pins | Mechanical damage from forcing or dropping the connector | Usually repairable |
| Noticeably weaker penetration than the paired probe | Reduced acoustic output from element ageing or a delaminating lens | Case by case |
| Intermittent signal that changes as the cable moves | One or more conductors broken inside the cable bundle | Case by case |
| Strain relief separated, split or stiff | Flex fatigue where the cable meets the probe or connector | Usually repairable |
| Cracked or dented housing | Impact damage; housing can usually be replaced or resealed | Usually repairable |
| Fluid found inside the probe head after a leak test | Seal failure allowing disinfectant ingress | Case by case |
| Failed electrical leakage test | Compromised sealing on an endocavity probe | Case by case |
Check these before you ship the probe
- Flex the cable gently along its length while imaging – intermittent dropout points to broken conductors.
- Check the strain reliefs at both ends for splits, stiffness or separation from the cable.
- Inspect the lens face under good light for cuts, bubbles, lifting edges or discoloration.
- Examine the connector for bent or corroded pins, cracks and a working locking mechanism.
- Run the system’s built-in probe test or element check if your console provides one.
- Have the probe leak-tested before further use – fluid ingress worsens quickly and creates a patient-safety issue.
Repair, exchange or replace — which applies to your 2050
Whether a 2050 is worth repairing depends on the damage scope: localized lens, cable, strain relief and connector faults are routine repairs, while widespread element loss usually is not economical. An exchange unit can bridge the gap when downtime matters, and replacement becomes rational when repair cost approaches replacement value. A written assessment settles this per probe – condition, not model, decides it.
What we need to quote your 2050 repair
- A clear photo of the complete manufacturer and model label on the probe
- A description of the fault: what you see on screen and when it started
- The ultrasound system (console) the probe is used with
- Screenshots or photos of the image problem, if the fault is visual
- Photos of any physical damage – lens, housing, cable or connector
Product imagery on this page is representative of the 2050 probe family and is not a photograph of your specific unit. This page does not claim OEM authorization or universal compatibility. Repair feasibility, turnaround and commercial terms are confirmed in writing after assessment of the actual probe.






Reviews
There are no reviews yet.